Showing posts with label online-tools. Show all posts
Showing posts with label online-tools. Show all posts

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Distracting Education: Social Media vs Deep Knowledge

Life, Stan Wayman, 1964
I never got to see The Beatles live in concert, but my Mum did. And apparently they were loud; well, the screaming was - she didn't hear much of the music, but she never forgot the experience.

Today, I can listen to The Beatles or watch a performance. I can join an online group to discuss which Beatle was more talented, or better looking. But I can never see them perform live; never enjoy Beatlemania.

Applying this to education; I believe virtual teaching, and embedded social media, are beneficial in some circumstances, but they are inferior substitutes for discussions in a real-world space with an expert mentor and a group of peers. They may in fact distract from a deep learning experience.

Video Conference and shared Interactive Whiteboard

Virtual Classroom

Just like the difference between watching a concert on TV and actually attending the concert, the emotional and sensory difference of watching a lecture online and actually being in the room may be measurable.

There are certain circumstances where virtual is the best you can get. For example taking a virtual excursion through the Powerhouse Museum, and asking the curator about the Enigma machine as he describes it's purpose and function. Much more viable than loading the class on a plane!

But as a learning experience I would argue that it's more memorable and valuable to actually be in the Museum, speaking face-to-face with the curator, and seeing the Enigma in real-space.

After teaching an HSC course via a virtual classroom for two years, virtual may be the best-effort when circumstances prevent real-world interaction; but when possible, real-world experience provides better sensory and memory learning.

http://www.laurenmacewen.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/ur-First-blol.jpeg
laurenmacewen.com/category/socialmedia/

Social media

My understanding of the purpose of social media in education is to improve student engagement; to promote shared experiences. I have seen how shared experiences such as in-class debates, performances, brainstorming sessions, and group projects have helped students explore personal qualities in a safe environment which they may have never attempted otherwise.

I've run classroom blogs and forums, and these can engage students (particularly the quiet/shy); but I think a teacher understands the needs of the class far better via direct contact; when you can "see the whites of their eyes".

In general, the "social" classroom (particularly for high-school students), is less about engagement of ideas, and more about discussion of things (e.g. cars), or people (e.g. celebrities).

And, due to the Dunning-Kruger effect, students can not be expected to evaluate their own learning needs, or that of their peers. Consequently, they are unlikely to independently commit time and resources in order to focus on the details and conceptual applications of a new idea; and therefore never acquire deep knowledge or understanding.

In fact, social media may inhibit or distract from real discussions about the core concepts.

http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/400/rbhavana/rbhavana1012/rbhavana101200545/8368475-neuron-in-isolated-background.jpg
Neuroplasticity

Deep Knowledge

Having an expert mentor to guide you through a field of study is essential.

Deep knowledge and understanding in any subject requires focused time and energy:
  1. to establish links to previous knowledge
  2. to explain, comprehend, and reinforce concepts
  3. to examine conceptual application in familiar and unfamiliar settings

The expert mentor can guide students through the concepts, and peers may contribute additional linking material, but if the social media conversation does not contribute to the depth of knowledge, it might distract and/or detract from the train of thought, drawing focus away from the subject, and disengaging the neural pathways that are required for deep knowledge.

Summary

I believe the best learning environment is with an expert mentor (and maybe some curious peers). Students can interact in real-time, grow as people, and grow in knowledge and understanding, without the filter and delay of intermediary technology. Virtual classrooms and social media are great substitutes if you can't engage in real-world activities due to distance or other circumstances; but they are only substitutes.

Online learning, virtual classrooms, and social media might be best-effort pedagogy, but not best-practice pedagogy. There's nothing like seeing the band perform live.

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

How To: Google Chrome and Tor

Tor (The Onion Router) is free software and an open network intended to enable online anonymity. The default browser bundle is the ESR version of Mozilla Firefox, which is good for privacy, but restricts functionality.

Security expert +Steve Gibson describes the benefits and structure of Tor in Security Now 70. The official Overview also outlines Why We Need Tor, and How It Works. And Wikipeida has a good summary or it's history, weaknesses, and legal issues.

The Tor Project strongly encourages the use of the Tor Browser Bundle instead of configuring your own browser. But, if you really want to use Chrome the following steps should help.
  1. Installation
    1. Follow standard procedure to install Tor
    2. Follow standard procedure to install Google Chrome (if you haven't installed already)
  2. Setup Tor
    1. Find the Vidalia application inside program folder Tor Browser / App
    2. Create a desktop or taskbar shortcut for the application (so you can start it easily or on startup; Vidalia is the Tor client GUI)
    3. Start Vidalia and ensure it can connect to the Tor network 
  3. Setup Chrome
    1. Start Chrome and add the Proxy SwitchySharp extension (or similar Proxy Switching extension; this will allow you to easily enable/disable Tor proxy)
    2. click to enlarge

    3. Go to Proxy SwitchySharp Options and setup a Tor proxy profile using:
      • Note: this is where this post differs from some others. You can confirm the settings required by reading Tor's configuration documentation, or by checking either Vidalia (Advanced Settings), or the Tor Browser (Firefox ESR) proxy settings.
  4. Operation
    1. Start Vidalia (using your shortcut from Step 2b)
    2. Start Chrome and enable your Tor Proxy profile (and possibly go Incognito)
    3. Check that Google Chrome is using Tor: https://check.torproject.org/

    4. Browse with anonymity (just a bit slower)
If you appreciate or benefit from The Tor Project then maybe consider volunteering or donating. :-)

ADDENDUM

You can configure your Tor client to select which nodes it uses to enter and exit the Tor network. This is useful if you want your IP address to appear to be from a particular country; enabling you to stream content which is restricted to (or excluded from) certain locations. An outline of this configuration process can be found at the official Tor Project FAQ, or for more detail search for "tor exit country".

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Giving the World Game Back to the World

Or: Democratising Football

http://www.fotopedia.com/items/flickr-2459274872
I'm not a football club owner. Not even a manager. I was once a high school football player. So the following comments are from an IT point of view; I have no experience running a football club or much else for that matter.

Recently Liverpool FC hasn't been playing too well, and usually mangement is to blame. In this particular case it's ownership ... a big legal battle abrews.

This raised some questions in my mind:
  • what is ownership?
  • how is it registered / controlled / enforced?
  • how can a suburb 'own' a football club?

Thinking about the last question I had an idea: put the ownership in the hands of the fans ... all of them ... millions ... around the world.

How?

InputsProcessesOutputs
money
  1. acquire cash
  2. make offer to buy
  3. if offer accepted then purchase and manage
ownership and management of Liverpool FC


STEP 1:

This could be tricky, especially for a new business paradigm. For a football club with such a large and enthusiastic fan base it seems obvious to ask the fans to buy in and control their own club. But why would they trust me to take their money and do the right thing. Escrow. Who would be the trusted independent third party?

  • Probably a national bank - keen to store money, and probably in for a cut of fees
  • escrow.com
  • FIFA

So, arrange a multi-million dollar escrow account. Advertise and get contributions from fans - maybe $2 each for an owner share and voting rights. One possible problem is a conglomerate purchasing a large slice of shares and taking control of the club - but how is that different from the current situation?

A website can link escrow funds to usernames, showing contributions raised and a countdown clock until offer will be made. The website could be used to blog ongoing issues and developments, and direct interested contributors to the escrow arrangement.

STEP 2:

Take the escrow money and offer to purchase the club. (How complicated can it be?) What UK foreign ownership laws apply? Probably need a business manager and some lawyers happening here.

STEP 3:

If offer is not accepted one of two things can happen:

  • all escrow funds can be returned to contributors
  • escrow can be extended, contributors can confirm their offer or retrieve their funds; more funds can be contributed before next offer is made

The choice of action could be left in the hands of the contributors using online polling.

If offer is accepted take the escrow funds and purchase the club - more lawyers?

Now the fun begins - escrow contributors become share owners, and can partake in management decisions via online polling. Choice of managers, players, venue construction, whatever it is that FC owners do. All in the hands of the fans - they can select and prioritise issues online. Management fees would probably apply to execute share owner decisions.

Once the club is back in the black, profits could be returned to the share owners in a manner of their personal choice.

Advantages:

Fans become share owners; they can influence the direction of their beloved club, and maybe make some money.

Disadvantages:

Would take a bit of trust and a lot of money to setup; and requrie a good management team to execute share owner decisions.

Let me know ...

  1. Could this work?
  2. Would you buy into a club?
  3. Should FIFA want to manage such a system, and give the world game back to the world?